From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 22 18:58:32 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA01918 for current-outgoing; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 18:58:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA01848 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 18:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id NAA04398; Sat, 23 Dec 1995 13:53:57 +1100 Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 13:53:57 +1100 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199512230253.NAA04398@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: current@freebsd.org, scrappy@hub.org Subject: Re: Conclusion to nfsiod/lkm problem... Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > After my last posting, where at the very bottom I questioned >my CFLAGS, I went into make.conf and removed the LDFLAGS=-static >line I had added in... > ...it compiles now. > So, the question remains...what is it about lkm that its functions >can't be statically linked? I'm not 100% certain of what lkm does, from Don't know, but LDFLAGS=-static means the same as LDFLAGS='-s tatic'. -s says to strip the object and the arg `tatic' is ignored. Perhaps you meant -Bstatic. Bruce