From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jun 1 4:53:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail1.bna.bellsouth.net (mail1.bna.bellsouth.net [205.152.150.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B20837B81A for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 04:53:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@siteplus.net) Received: from discover.siteplus.net (host-209-215-8-3.cha.bellsouth.net [209.215.8.3]) by mail1.bna.bellsouth.net (3.3.5alt/0.75.2) with ESMTP id HAA07248; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:49:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:49:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks To: Warner Losh Cc: Bharat Mediratta , Erik Trulsson , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GENERIC 4.0 kernel compile fails on in_cksum.c In-Reply-To: <200006010118.TAA26044@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 31 May 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > Kris is wrong, or at least he's being overly agressive in what he > claims isn't supported. It does work. And we've traditionally > supported updating from the last -stable release from N-1 to the > stable branch of N.0. And often it will work after N.0. However, you > must follow the updated UPDATING file from -stable for it to work. In > 3.x, you could update through about 3.2 from 2.2.8. Due to the huge > number of changes in the 3.x branch after 3.2, you couldn't push it > much past 3.2. > > So far there have been no show stopper MFC into the 4.0-stable > branch. So long as that's the case, I'm going to keep claiming that > one can update from source. > > Warner I did one last week with no problem. Unless there has been a major change in the source within the last week it should still work. Jim Weeks -------- A mind is a terrible thing to lose! How I miss mine.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message