Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      23 Apr 2001 05:46:41 EST
From:      "Mark Sergeant" <msergeant@snsonline.net>
To:        <joeo@cracktown.com>, markemmanuel <lists@markemmanuel.org>
Cc:        "Questions freebsd.org" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Gaming on FreeBSD...
Message-ID:  <200104231046.f3NAkg103268@xyzzy.intranet.snsonline.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104210003290.20462-100000@asmodean.nks.net>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104210003290.20462-100000@asmodean.nks.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quake 1 & 2 also work fine, tought when I tried to install Unreal Tournament
last night on one of my boxes it would refuse to recognise the cd-rom to
install it from so I have no idea on UT. Quake 3 also runs relatively well, to
think my boss thinks I don't play games because I only have FreeBSD on my
laptop.

Cheers,

Mark

On Sat, 21 Apr 2001 00:31:33 -0400 (EDT), <joeo@cracktown.com> said:

> The linux emulation layer isn't really an emualtor in the *BSD's.  They
>  are a minimal set of shims that allow syscalls made by a running linux
>  binary to work.  They are an alternate set of syscalls, which are wrappers
>  arround the native freebsd ones.  When a linux binary is executed the
>  binary image "activator" recognizes it as a linux binary and sets up the
>  process table/syscall table entries for this new process telling the
>  kernel that for this process these shims are the entry points for any
>  syscalls that happen, instead of the native bsd ones.
>  
>  There is really no overhead for using these shims.
>  
>  The main difference in gaming on a freebsd box instead of a linux box is
>  that their are some differences in the way the schedulers on FreeBSD and
>  Linux boxes behave, especially for multithreaded applications.
>  
>  Myth2 runs, as does Unreal Tournament and Quake3.  The latter two may
>  require a bit of work to get a 3d accelerator card running.
>  
>  On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, markemmanuel wrote:
>  
>  > I'm slowly pulling myself off of Microsoft's control over my computing
>  > needs.  I'm really interested in the state of gaming on FreeBSD.  I'm aware
>  > of binary compatibility on for Linux but how much is the performance
>  > affected FreeBSD? I'm interested in games like SimCity 3000, Myth ii, and
>  > Unreal Tournament.  How does it stack up?  Thanks.
>  >
>  > markemmanuel
>  >
>  >
>  > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>  > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>  >
>  
>  
>  To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>  with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>  
>  

-- 
The Sixth Commandment of Frisbee:
	The greatest single aid to distance is for the disc to be going
in a direction you did not want.   (Goes the wrong way = Goes a long
way.)
		-- Dan Roddick



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104231046.f3NAkg103268>