From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 3 07:49:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA24876 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 07:49:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA24841; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 07:49:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA08704; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 16:47:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA06632; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 16:47:49 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980903164748.25255@follo.net> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 16:47:48 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , BSD User Group Hamburg Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, postmaster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: An Open Letter To The FreeBSD Core Team References: <19980903120643.A20537@cons.org> <11246.904827833@time.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <11246.904827833@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Thu, Sep 03, 1998 at 06:03:53AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Sep 03, 1998 at 06:03:53AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > charters? Handbook? Huh?!") is only going to increase and drive more > people out of the various "tech" lists. I regret this as much as > anyone, of course, but short of going to a very "expensive" moderation > scheme or something yet to be invented, I don't see many alternatives. > We can either work on FreeBSD or we can read mail - which would most > of you prefer? :-) Code. However, in order to have a place for discussion architecture, we need at least one non-noisy list. I hereby volunteer to moderate a freebsd-architecture list (given that the one we have now is dead, we might as well re-use the name, I guess). I'd be happy if there also was a freebsd-kernel for non-moderated discussion (to take some of the non-fitting load off -hackers and -current), but I don't put that as a requirement. I'd also be happy to have a backup-moderator (yes, I remember who volunteered before, but I won't hold you to it unless you still want to), but it isn't a requirement - it would just mean that things will go quicker in the periods where I'm not available. Eivind, who is very well aware that there are people that probably are more competent to do this, but hasn't seen any of them volunteering. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message