From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 6 03:26:28 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA14006 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 03:26:28 -0700 Received: from glenlivet.ohm.york.ac.uk (root@glenlivet.ohm.york.ac.uk [144.32.136.21]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA13939 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 03:22:12 -0700 Received: by glenlivet.ohm.york.ac.uk id m0sIvlu-0004fOC (/\##/\ Smail3.1.29.2 #29.2); Tue, 6 Jun 95 11:22 BST Message-Id: Date: Tue, 6 Jun 95 11:22 BST From: "Duncan McL Barclay" To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Bug (?) in 2.0.5A with ed1 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm having trouble with my ethernet card whilst installing 2.0.5A on my 486box. I have an SMC 8013 card that has worked perfectly with 2.0R for the past few months, and still works under 2.0R. After setting up the network (ifconfig, route) etc I just get ed1 timeouts. Quick grep on the 2.0.5A messages gives: Jan 1 12:20:10 elan kernel: ed1 at 0x300-0x31f irq 5 maddr 0xd8000 msize 16384 on isa Jan 1 12:20:10 elan kernel: ed1: address 00:00:c0:d4:f7:6b, type WD8013EPC (16 bit) whilst the 2.0R messages gives Jan 1 12:23:46 elan kernel: ed1 at 0x300-0x31f irq 9 maddr 0xd8000 msize 16384 on isa Jan 1 12:23:46 elan kernel: ed1: address 00:00:c0:d4:f7:6b, type WD8013EPC (16 bit) (please ignore the dates, the CMOS clock wibbles sometimes!) As the only difference is the IRQ is there a problem in the config for the 2.0.5A GENERIC kernel? Thanks Raggy ______________________________________________________________________________ Raggy | God smiles upon the little children, the alcoholics, and dmlb@ohm.york.ac.uk | the permanently stoned. S.King. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------