From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Sep 9 15:22:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D79A37B400 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.targetnet.com (smtp.targetnet.com [205.150.0.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB79443E65 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:22:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tstrike@zaq.com) Received: from toronto.zaq.com ([199.243.100.254] helo=zaq-msg-02.corp.zaq.com) by smtp.targetnet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17oWvX-000Gio-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 18:22:39 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: IGNORE: Vinum & disklabel - da1 through da3 vs da4s1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 18:11:52 -0400 Message-ID: <0802E6A56AA390479CD80AD308CA66343F335F@zaq-msg-02.corp.zaq.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Vinum & disklabel - da1 through da3 vs da4s1 Thread-Index: AcJYTDJAqVfLO4rMR2utydUKJT7PzwAAh/9A From: "Tim Strike" To: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Never mind, this disk apparently was offline when the system was first = installed by the network folks; a MAKEDEV da4 seems to have solved the = problem. Now da4 appears like the remainder of the drives... -ts. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Strike=20 > Sent: September 9, 2002 17:55 > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Vinum & disklabel - da1 through da3 vs da4s1 >=20 >=20 > I'm attempting to setup a vinum volume over four scsi drives=20 > (da1 through da4) -- when I use disklabel to change the type=20 > from 'unused' to ' vinum', the disklabel -e works=20 > okay for da1, da2 and da3. When I get to da4, it complains=20 > miserably -- so I tried disklabel -e da4s1 and this contains=20 > what I expect. Is it normal to change the label'ing after=20 > the 4th disk (da4 would be the 5th disk)? Any reason for=20 > this inconsistency -- it surely complicates matters for those=20 > unfamiliar with the internals of FBSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message