Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:42:42 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Chris Costello <chris@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenPAM Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202221439540.74100-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020222163458.K18366@holly.calldei.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The advantages to using linux_pam is obviously that we get to piggyback off them for new kinds of pam modules etc. Is this still the case? can a linux_pam module be used (once compiled for FreeBSD) on a FreeBSD system? how much work is it to convert the source for a Linux Pam module to a BSD-PAM module? The deliberatly gave the Linux-poam stuff a BSD copyright originally to allow us to use it.. WHy does it need to be rewritten? On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Chris Costello wrote: > On Friday, February 22, 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Since the two previous releases have solicited absolutely no feedback > > other than to point out a broken link on the project's web page, I > > assume that everybody is happy with the code, and that nobody will > > object when I import it into CVS and ditch Linux-PAM later this > > weekend. > > I'm all for it. Thanks, DES! > > -- > +-------------------+-------------------------------------------------+ > | Chris Costello | This system will self-destruct in five minutes. | > | chris@FreeBSD.org | | > +-------------------+-------------------------------------------------+ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0202221439540.74100-100000>