From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 13:51:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD9537B401; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:51:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (ip114.bella-vista.sfo.interquest.net [66.199.86.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D3744001; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:51:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5UKp412002690; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:51:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5UKp4lm002689; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:51:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:51:04 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20030630205104.GA2498@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ruslan Ermilov , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org References: <200306301948.h5UJmE5U029624@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306301948.h5UJmE5U029624@repoman.freebsd.org> cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.lib.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:51:06 -0000 On Mon, Jun 30, 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > ru 2003/06/30 12:48:14 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > share/mk bsd.lib.mk > Log: > Removed suffix-transformation rules that are duplicates > (or are subsets) of the corresponding rules in sys.mk. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.144 +0 -20 src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk You realize that each of the three times today you've churned the code in this file, you've made it harder for me to integrate the patches I proposed on arch@ last week, right? You knew about them, so coordination would have been appreciated. In any case, I'm heading off for a vacation soon, so I'll assume this was bad timing and rewrite and retest my changes next week.