From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Sep 19 11:52:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397CE37B424 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 11:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13bSVX-000Nm0-00; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:52:43 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA73093; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:52:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:52:43 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: Brett Glass Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new license idea? Message-ID: <20000919195242.B72836@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000919104443.00bf44b0@localhost> <20000919160157.A70731@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20000919104443.00bf44b0@localhost> <20000919175403.B71735@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20000919124101.05089eb0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000919124101.05089eb0@localhost>; from brett@lariat.org on Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 12:46:46PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org | Fragmentation/forking can be as much a sign of creativity and progress as | a problem. It is only problematic when it is used by a large company | (e.g. Microsoft) as a bludgeon. Or when it breaks compatibility and | there's not appropriate backward compatibility. I understand that there are 2 forks in windows development, but how are they used to bludgeon, since they are targeted at 2 different audiences? jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message