From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 06:36:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371A916A41B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2620413C46B for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 68378 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2008 06:37:01 -0000 Received: from ppp-71-139-9-226.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO ?10.0.5.18?) (nate-mail@71.139.9.226) by root.org with ESMTPA; 13 Jan 2008 06:37:01 -0000 Message-ID: <4789B188.5040208@root.org> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:36:56 -0800 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" References: <47893F8B.7010805@root.org> <1200197053.822.5.camel@RabbitsDen> In-Reply-To: <1200197053.822.5.camel@RabbitsDen> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fix for GPE livelock on HPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:36:59 -0000 Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 14:30 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: >> I've committed the below patch and want to MFC it to 7.0. To do this, I >> need people to test this quickly. It probably has no effect in 6.x and >> probably doesn't apply cleanly there. >> >> Please try this patch if you have a laptop and 7.x. If you have > I assumed you mean "a laptop", not "an HP laptop" ;) With this in mind, > on IBM ThinkPad X60 (1709-73U) and RELENG_7 as of 20:46 January 12 (EST) > I see no obvious regressions after applying your patch. > > If there is any specific testing that you want performed, please, let me > know and I will be happy to do it tomorrow. Excellent. I was kinda vague because I have two "it fixes my HP laptop" reports and I wanted broader testing so that after the MFC I didn't hear "it breaks my Toshiba". :) -Nate