From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 14 14:09:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1F716A4E5 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web32711.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32711.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D7F843D45 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:09:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 97514 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jul 2006 14:09:27 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=M/qwPnq0B3EWRCcmi4Y6gO98aGWqRX6kKFFCVsmXKQdDD23TueIch9VTctf+gM1b+DenUq+AFrOsN9aA4B6jRVDX50x9MuMl8MB3Y13udBON66lZYU1M4SyFndOX70zbE0EgeRyTbA6ZD5DjNpowL67//1xPpVmaqGxHbErYbxg= ; Message-ID: <20060714140927.97512.qmail@web32711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.118.78.140] by web32711.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:09:27 CEST Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:09:27 +0200 (CEST) From: To: Dejan Lesjak , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200607141353.57338.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:09:37 -0000 Hello; --- Dejan Lesjak ha scritto: > On Friday 14 July 2006 01:59, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: > > Hi; > > > > Just here mumbling... > > > > It would be interesting to set > > > > X11BASE=/usr/X11 when using XFree86 and > > X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} when using XOrg. > > > > Not only due to historical consistency (/usr/X11 is the path recommended in > > XFree86 manpages), but as a way to be able to use XFree86 and keep the > > system somewhat cleaner. > > Well, I was planing XFree86 would move to LOCALBASE as well - if it doesn't, > ports depending on X11 would have to special case XFree86 libraries and > includes and such, which would make system a bit less clean. Why do you think > Hmm.. there should be no need to have special cases for ports that properly respect X11BASE. Ports that don't respect X11BASE (those that have /usr/X11R6 hard coded) should be cleaned/fixed anyways. > using /usr/X11 would make things cleaner? > I haven't checked lately but XFree86 and XOrg are currently in conflict aren't they? One has to deinstall and rebuild all the packages built with XOrg and start a fresh build to use XFree86. Having XFree86 on it's own prefix would avoid the problem of having packages built with the wrong version of X and it also make an eventual clean up easier. I think the user perceived default wouldn't change, with most people using XOrg in LOCALBASE, and some people using XFree86 in X11BASE. Of course if eventually X11BASE disappears is another matter, but at least for backwards compatibility (4.x?) it's good to have it for a while. just my 0.02$ Pedro. Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com