From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 2 14:50:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61F016A4D0 for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 14:50:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF3F43D1F for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 14:50:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j42EoFlw061457 for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 14:50:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j42EoFKc061456; Mon, 2 May 2005 14:50:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 14:50:15 GMT Message-Id: <200505021450.j42EoFKc061456@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Renato Botelho Subject: Re: ports/75147: [PATCH] Several improvements to security/putty, mainly pterm X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Renato Botelho List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 14:50:16 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/75147; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Renato Botelho To: Jilles Tjoelker Cc: Renato Botelho , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Volker Stolz Subject: Re: ports/75147: [PATCH] Several improvements to security/putty, mainly pterm Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:49:47 -0300 On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:46:06PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:13:21AM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote: > > The port was updated to 0.58 version, and seems this patch was applied > > on default source code, could you confirm it? > > Only the check that the slave device can be opened was included, the > rest was not (chowning/chmodding the slave device back in suidroot mode, > using proper /dev/tty[pqrsPQRS][0-9a-v] instead of > /dev/tty[p-z][0-9a-f], making sure the slave device is open before doing > tcsetattr() or TIOCSWINSZ). Did developers give you a reason to don't include it? Or will it be included on new version? Volker, sorry about my last mail, I was confused about submitter's email and send a bounce to to gnats and you.. one more time, sorry. Thanks -- Renato Botelho AIM: RBGargaBR | ICQ: 54596223 GnuPG Key: http://www.galle.com.br/~renato/pubkey.asc Census Taker to Housewife: Did you ever have the measles, and, if so, how many?