From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 17:35:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CE516A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:35:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao10.cox.net (lakermmtao10.cox.net [68.230.240.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965A543D4C for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:35:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040624173503.TAYH25843.lakermmtao10.cox.net@mezz>; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:35:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:35:40 -0500 To: "Pav Lucistnik" References: <1088081027.73702.15.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1088081027.73702.15.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is pan2 an orphaned port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:35:22 -0000 On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:43:47 +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > V čt, 24. 06. 2004 v 14:34, Conrad J. Sabatier píše: > >> Just wondering, if no one is currently officially assigned to maintain >> pan2, I'd be willing to take it on. The latest version on the website >> now is 0.14.2.91, which has been available for quite some time now. >> >> Should I go ahead and have a go at submitting a port > > Pan2 is being actively maintained by FreeBSD/GNOME team. > 0.14.2.91 is development release, we don't port development releases, > only stable ones. I have my own pan-devel port for age, you can grab it if you want to. http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/shar/ The 0.14.2.91 is very stable and I think it's lesser bug than release version. :-) Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org