From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Mar 16 15:26:50 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from viper.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C826C37BC40
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:26:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ade@lovett.com)
Received: from ade by viper.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 12Vjd9-0002ay-00; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 17:24:39 -0600
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 17:24:39 -0600
From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com>
To: insane@lunatic.oneinsane.net
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Can this get added
Message-ID: <20000316172439.A9947@viper.lovett.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:40:42 -0800" <20000316144042.B28224@lunatic.oneinsane.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> Just ran across this.. It looks cool it is functional. Do you think
> someone could get it added into the tree?
> 
>         http://web.wt.net/~billw/gkrellm/gkrellm.html 

You mean like this?

	http://www.lovett.com/FreeBSD/gkrellm.shar

Please let me know if this works for you -- it's running fine here
on my main box (running 3.4-STABLE).. I'll commit it after the thaw.

I chose the route of not using libgtop, since that would require
vast chunks of GNOME.

The 'native' method is likely to be less portable, though,
and libgtop will get around some of these issues, so I'd have
no problem going this way if people wanted it.

-aDe

-- 
Ade Lovett, Austin, TX.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message