From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 1 21:49:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECCB16A400 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 21:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB54813C455 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 21:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 05D6AC2F2; Tue, 1 May 2007 17:49:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on zoraida.natserv.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME autolearn=disabled version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails * -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP Received: from 35st.simplicato.com (static-71-249-233-130.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.249.233.130]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2A9C2F4; Tue, 1 May 2007 17:49:13 -0400 (EDT) References: <20070422124731.GA20548@harmless.hu> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Greg Troxel Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 17:49:13 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: distributed filesystems X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 21:49:17 -0000 Greg Troxel writes: > Coda (http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/) works well on NetBSD-current, in > which I just fixed the kernel module to conform to updated/simplified .. > There's also arla (afs working client, and server that I'm not sure of > the status). >From a performance perspective would you recommend Coda or Arla? Are distributed filesystems fast enough to handle something like a mailstore for a busy Imap/pop3 server?