Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:19:04 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about portmaster Message-ID: <52F612A8.4070708@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1402071131550.20481@wonkity.com> References: <CAJ5UdcN-WoQ457c9oJiVx3VPJsZJ%2Be3xdzXemdB3wz4=Cxz8mQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1402071131550.20481@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--gsP4uoj1uPT4s08nVvJcJJ2v3TDwstjp1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 07/02/2014 18:46, Warren Block wrote:
>> I have a little problem with xorg deps that I get errors,
>> I run
>> # portmaster --check-depends
>> but I am afraid to mess up, how can I fix these once and for all?
>> ``
>> pkg_version: corrupted record for package icon-naming-utils-0.8.90_1
>> (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring
>=20
> I don't know a specific answer to this, it probably means that some
> dependencies are missing, but it did make me realize that this error ha=
s
> not appeared since I switched pkg(8).
Absolutely. You won't get this error with pkg(8) -- it's just not
possible to get that sort of corruption in the local.sqlite schema
pkg(8) uses. (All too easy with pkg_tools as anyone who has used
portmaster+pkg_tools will testify.)
To fix the OP's problem once and for all:
# /usr/sbin/pkg -v
[ Answer the prompts in the affirmative ]
# pkg2ng -p
# echo 'WITH_PKGNG=3DYES' >> /etc/make.conf
# pkg check -ad
[ Optional -- this will point up any missing dependencies ]
When running 'pkg check' you will be prompted to install missing
packages from whatever repository (if any) you have configured. If
you're going to be building everything from ports, at that point you
should take note of what is missing, quit out of 'pkg check' and build
the missing bits using portmaster. (In fact, you'll probably find that
there aren't actually any missing bits: what's gone wrong is recording
which package is required by which other package correctly.)
Yes, this is quite a radical solution, but it's the only way to achieve
that 'once and for all' condition. You can use 'portmaster
--check-depends' to fix things up, but eventually the problem will recur
if you stick with pkg_tools.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
--gsP4uoj1uPT4s08nVvJcJJ2v3TDwstjp1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=JBiT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gsP4uoj1uPT4s08nVvJcJJ2v3TDwstjp1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52F612A8.4070708>