From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Feb  6 17:08:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA19810
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:08:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA19804
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1)
	id E0vsen0-0007NJ-00; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 18:07:42 -0700
To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: How paranoid is Theo? (was Re: Karl fulminates, film at 11. == , thanks) 
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>,
        Craig Shaver <craig@progroup.com>, current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 07 Feb 1997 09:52:33 +0900."
		<Pine.SV4.3.95.970207094754.5515B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> 
References: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970207094754.5515B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>  
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 18:07:42 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0vsen0-0007NJ-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <Pine.SV4.3.95.970207094754.5515B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> Michael Hancock writes:
: With the stuff you've looked at so far does it look like Theo is going
: after each and every buffer overflow possibility or the just the ones that
: can be exploited?

Mostly just exploitable or likely exploitable ones.

Warner