From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 6 03:30:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5AA1065740 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DA08FC0C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p463UJYA011941 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:30:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p463UJQx011938; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:30:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:30:19 GMT Message-Id: <201105060330.p463UJQx011938@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: Marcus Reid Cc: Subject: Re: kern/156667: [em] em0 fails to init on CURRENT after March 17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marcus Reid List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 03:30:19 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/156667; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marcus Reid To: Arnaud Lacombe Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/156667: [em] em0 fails to init on CURRENT after March 17 Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:53:27 -0700 On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:22:47PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > could you include the output of `netstat -m' ? it is all likely to be > yet another "`nmbclusterrs' too low issue", in which case bumping > `kern.ipc.nmbclusters' will do the job. Here's default, with problem: 1025/640/1665 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 1023/297/1320/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 1023/257 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/35/35/12800 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/6400 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/3200 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 2302K/894K/3196K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0/0/0 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines Here's with kern.ipc.nmbclusters bumped to 100000, same problem: 1025/640/1665 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 1023/305/1328/100000 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 1023/257 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/35/35/50000 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/25000 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/12500 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 2302K/910K/3212K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0/0/0 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines