Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:32:31 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Message-ID: <199906241932.MAA01005@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:56:07 BST." <E10xBrD-0000S5-00@fanf.noc.demon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> wrote: > > > >Sorry to follow up on my own message, but I noted today in PCWeek > >their trip back to the benchmark lab includes ripping 3 CPUs and > >768M RAM out of the system, to benchmark how Linux and NT perform > >on "lower-end" hardware. They also allowed the RedHat dudes to > >switch to an Adaptec SCSI controller to talk to the RAID array. > >How are we holding up under this "diminished" configuration? > > It's stupid to tune everything for performance except for the web > server -- they should be using Zeus, not Apache. The Zeus evaluation license prohibits its use for benchmarks, and the Zeus folks failed to respond to any of my attempts to communicate. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906241932.MAA01005>