Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Aug 1997 13:12:41 -0400 (EDT)
From:      john hood <cgull@smoke.marlboro.vt.us>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        Ada T Lim <ada@not-enough.bandwidth.org>, jamil@counterintelligence.ml.org (Jamil J. Weatherbee), freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD --- ALPHA 
Message-ID:  <199708131712.NAA03925@smoke.marlboro.vt.us>
In-Reply-To: <22390.871468993@time.cdrom.com>
References:  <199708130841.SAA13894@polya.blah.org> <22390.871468993@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--IfVSRq12y7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
 > Naw, it's probably just a standard alpha motherboard and CPU with the
 > SRM console instead of the ARC console code.  That's another IBU
 > within DEC and they have their own little surcharges for using SRM
 > which get passed on to the consumer.
 > 
 > 					Jordan

There are actually different parts available from the semiconductor
folks, one which is subtly munged in its MMU so that it cannot run
OSF/1 (or SRM, I don't know which).  Here's a message body out of one
of the linux mailing lists-- sorry about the lack of headers, it came
out of some modestly-evil WWW search UI.

  --jh
-- 
John Hood				cgull@smoke.marlboro.vt.us

Predictably, they all eventually wandered away, rubbing their bruises
and brushing mud out of their hair.  Some went off to work for the
ESA, launching much smaller rockets into low orbits, while others
elected to sit on their front porches drinking Jim Beam from the
bottle and launching bottle rockets from the empties. [Jordan Hubbard]


--IfVSRq12y7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Description: goo from the dark side
Content-Disposition: inline;
	filename="include.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 20 Feb 1996, David Mosberger wrote:

> As long as it's capable of running Linux, most people probably won't
> have a problem with this, if it means cheaper machines.  However, is
> this different behavior *documented* someplace?  I'd really hate
> spending hours debugging something that just doesn't work according to
> specs.  If the hw ref manuals are accurate all is fine.  Otherwise, I
> might just as well buy an x86.  Intel has a real good history of not
> documenting chip features (at least not without NDA).  I hope Digital
> is not following the same path.

And Erik wrote:

>>Last thing I heard, none of these crippled chips have actually been
>>manufactured yet. Jim Paradis knows all about this stuff though... care
>>to speak up Jim?

>>Erik

    The 'crippled' versions have a -Pn suffix (for various integer n) and
    the difference in behaviour is documented in the IPR chapter of the
    HRM, rev C (EC-QAEQC-TE) and later (I expect it is also documented
    elsewhere).

    This change is not (nor is it intended to be) a hidden, undocumented
    feature. The reason for its introduction is a reflection of the way
    that businesses are organised (and therefore revenue channelled)
    within Digital. That's beyond the scope of this discussion (no flames,
    please).

    To repeat: behaviour of -Pn versions is INDETERMINATE if you try to
    run the SRM, OpenVMS and Digital Unix. What that means is that it may
    work or it may not work. This gives us (Digital) the ability to sell
    identical chips or chips that have had the documented features
    disabled. Today, the chips are identical. Tomorrow (and particularly
    with the introduction of the 21164A) that may not be the case.

    The two features that are (maybe) disabled in the -Pn versions are:

    1) SPE[0] must always be SET in ICSR (Ibox csr)

    2) SP[0] must always be SET in the MCSR (Mbox CSR).

    These features control one of the superpage mappings. It is a static
    configuration that is performed during initialisation.

    My job is to provide factory apps. support for customers who design
    with Digital's silicon so I guess, on this one, I speak for Digital.


    regards,

    Neal.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Neal Crook
    Principal Engineer, European Semiconductor Applications Engineering

    Digital Equipment Co. LTD            EMAIL  neal.crook@reo.mts.dec.com
    Mailstop RE02-F/B3                   Tel.   +44 1734 206297
    Digital Park                         FAX    +44 1734 203133
    Imperial Way,
    Reading, RG2 0TU
    ENGLAND
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------------------------------oOOo---------------------------------

--IfVSRq12y7--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708131712.NAA03925>