From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 18 15:39:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6E27016A4CE; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 492AD43E36; Tue, 18 May 2004 11:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo@icir.org)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4IIBsgd047168;
	Tue, 18 May 2004 11:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org)
Received: (from rizzo@localhost)
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3/Submit) id i4IIBsVO047167;
	Tue, 18 May 2004 11:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo)
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 11:11:54 -0700
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
Message-ID: <20040518111153.A46894@xorpc.icir.org>
References: <20040425094940.A50968@xorpc.icir.org>
	<200405162013.33894.dfr@nlsystems.com> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0405181021470.8050@zeus>
	<20040518014828.B2380@xorpc.icir.org>
	<1084885227.23208.3.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com>
	<20040518090647.A39810@xorpc.icir.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.60.0405181817030.16008@zeus>
	<1084898991.23208.14.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <1084898991.23208.14.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com>;
	from dfr@nlsystems.com on Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:49:51PM +0100
cc: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: new arp code snapshot for review...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 22:39:15 -0000

On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:49:51PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
...
> > The most common use of that table is to have an l3_addr and search the 
> > ll_addr, right? In that case making ll_addr variable shouldn't have a 
> > measurable influence on speed. Variable l3_addr could be different though.
> 
> Well it seems to me that IPv6 neighbour discovery is different enough
> from ARP that it makes sense to have IPv4-specialised ARP and

actually, not too much -- the patch i used already included
nd6 code that borrowed a lot from the v4 version.
anyways, as i said, i need to think a bit about things before
making a decision.

	cheers
	luigi
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"