From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jul 10 17:40: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D1B37B405 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:40:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f6B0e1v61308; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:40:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200107110040.f6B0e1v61308@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Leo Bicknell Subject: Re: conf/28882: Network defaults are absurdly low. Reply-To: Leo Bicknell Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR conf/28882; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Leo Bicknell To: "Richard A. Steenbergen" Cc: bicknell@ufp.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, billf@elvis.mu.org Subject: Re: conf/28882: Network defaults are absurdly low. Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:37:05 -0400 Also, FWIW, there is a related bug that keeps Richard's suggestion from working, it would appear: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11966 So even if his idea is deemed the best solution, something else needs to be fixed to get network performance up to par. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440 Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message