From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 13:02:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BA216A425; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:02:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548F543D46; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:02:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA07A709F6; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:00:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from fw.reifenberger.com (ppp-62-245-210-5.mnet-online.de [62.245.210.5]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7841345E8; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:02:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by fw.reifenberger.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jAGD0uAh002384; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:00:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fw.reifenberger.com: mike owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:00:56 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Reifenberger To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20051116120023.GB86977@ip.net.ua> Message-ID: <20051116135921.W2295@fw.reifenberger.com> References: <20051116123612.J2025@fw.reifenberger.com> <20051116120023.GB86977@ip.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: ng_split X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:02:16 -0000 On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:00:23 +0200 > From: Ruslan Ermilov > To: Michael Reifenberger > Cc: FreeBSD-Current > Subject: Re: ng_split > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 12:41:48PM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote: >> Hi, >> the change below doesnt look canonical to me, >> since it contains an NG at the beginning allready >> and no other ng node type does this. >> > You're right about this, but you probably read the patch in reverse > way. My fix makes the name match the rest of the world: > Oh, yes! I missed it. So its broken on RELENG_6 still. >> > I fail to see a reason at the moment., > Then MFC please :-) Bye/2 --- Michael Reifenberger, Business Development Manager SAP-Basis, Plaut Consulting Comp: Michael.Reifenberger@plaut.de | Priv: Michael@Reifenberger.com http://www.plaut.de | http://www.Reifenberger.com