From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 12:29:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC4F16A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:29:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A751043D3B for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:29:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A573872DCA; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:29:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DC972DC5; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:29:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:29:46 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Jon Noack In-Reply-To: <3FD3AA5D.8010409@alumni.rice.edu> Message-ID: <20031208122821.C15361@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <3FD3AA5D.8010409@alumni.rice.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2: will standard-supfile point to RELENG_5_2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 20:29:47 -0000 On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Jon Noack wrote: > I ask this for 5.2 because it never happened for 5.1: > Will src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile be updated to point to > the "RELENG_5_2" tag instead of "." for 5.2? Doubtful -- standard-supfile is for grabbing -current. If you want a specific tag, you need to specify it. I just copy the same cvsupfile around to different machines as I build them so I don't forget :) I agree that stable-supfile should be updated, though. But 5.X isn't -stable yet. :) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org