Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 02:48:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 200894] security/libressl not using hardware aesni acceleration Message-ID: <bug-200894-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200894 Bug ID: 200894 Summary: security/libressl not using hardware aesni acceleration Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: vsevolod@FreeBSD.org Reporter: dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au Assignee: vsevolod@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(vsevolod@FreeBSD.org) While testing the features of libressl 2.1.7 on FreeBSD 10.1Stable it appeared that libressl is not using hardware acceleration. openssl aes256 encrypt/decrypt 160MB file: 0.686157 secs (244509876 bytes/sec) libressl aes256 encrypt/decrypt 160MB file: 1.768195 secs (94883282 bytes/sec) openssl speed -evp aes-256-cbc: 74691.70k 288535.11k 876427.49k 5323319.66k 29095886.85k libressl, speed -evp aes-256-cbc: 95036.12k 103030.42k 104839.86k 105190.19k 105840.81k These results were on a Xeon 1230Lv3 cpu (using aesni features). The encrypt/decrypt test used dd if=/dev/zero bs=1m count=160 | openssl enc -e -aes-256-cbc -pass pass:p1 | openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -d -pass pass:p1 > /dev/null The performance of using des3-cbc was similar (as it was not affected by hardware acceleration). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-200894-13>