From owner-cvs-all Thu Oct 8 07:16:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA04331 for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:16:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA04315 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:16:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca32-44.ix.netcom.com [209.109.239.44]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA20321 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id HAA14611; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810081416.HAA14611@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> To: committers@freebsd.org Subject: IMPORTANT -- creating new directories for existing ports From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Folks, Let me repeat once more than if you are considering "splitting" a port up, please drop me a note. It doesn't matter whether the new one is "foo-current" or "bar-stable" or "baz5" or whatever. If there already exists a port of a different version of the same software in the ports tree, tell me first. Doing it right from the beginning is trivial -- fixing it up afterwards is virtually impossible. Satoshi