From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 08:18:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FB816A403 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:18:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from fly.ebs.gr (fly.ebs.gr [83.171.239.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D85D43D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:18:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from ebs.gr (root@hal.ebs.gr [10.1.1.2]) by fly.ebs.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k498IFGP047280; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:18:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from [10.1.1.157] (pc157.ebs.gr [10.1.1.157]) by ebs.gr (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k498IaUr016555; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:18:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Message-ID: <44605047.6070702@ebs.gr> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:18:15 +0300 From: Panagiotis Astithas Organization: EBS Ltd. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman References: <20060509013437.9828845053@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: <20060509013437.9828845053@ptavv.es.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Very slow screensaver with 2.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 08:18:36 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: >> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 07:47:02AM -0400, Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner wrote: >> >>> Same problem here. >>> As a matter of fact, everything under Gnome since the 2.14 upgrade is >>> unbelievably slow (if I remember correctly, when it was released I read >> I had the same problem but I could solve it with a complete rebuild of >> x11/gnome2: "portupgrade -Rf x11/gnome2". Now it's indeed faster than >> 2.12. > > I did the same on my laptop and it made a huge difference. No to do it on the system with the 22 second delay! > > I do wish I knew exactly what caused this, but it seems that even with the 2.14 simplified upgrade, it's really best to rebuild EVERYTHING. :-( This fixed the same issue for me too, but I've been having this problem for quite a few weeks now, long before the 2.14 upgrade. It could have occurred after the libtool upgrade, but I'm not sure. Cheers, Panagiotis