From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 7 21:21:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2FA37B422 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 21:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA40903; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 22:21:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA51278; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 22:21:09 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200009080421.WAA51278@harmony.village.org> To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: 'interrupt-level buffer overflows' for sio device? Cc: Bruce Evans , The Hermit Hacker , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORGG In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Sep 2000 21:17:14 PDT." <200009080417.VAA32639@pike.osd.bsdi.com> References: <200009080417.VAA32639@pike.osd.bsdi.com> Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 22:21:09 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200009080417.VAA32639@pike.osd.bsdi.com> John Baldwin writes: : My guess then is that we aren't scheduling the : soft interrupt to harvest the data in the top half from the bottom half. That's what I think as well. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message