From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 21:43:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3BA1065672; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C759C8FC16; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q21LhQGK060486; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:43:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <074901ccf7f3$d7ca6160$875f2420$@fisglobal.com> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:43:25 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4F26CC5A.2070501@FreeBSD.org> <4F4C0600.2000903@FreeBSD.org> <3BA1B476-ED05-4E8E-8DFA-0B06EFB48867@samsco.org> <201202280846.08966.jhb@freebsd.org> <4F4F35B9.5090308@FreeBSD.org> <06bb01ccf7cb$b255a200$1700e600$@fisglobal.com> <26352740-D897-46CD-BD17-C61334826524@samsco.org> <4F4FE9E1.4020201@freebsd.org> <074901ccf7f3$d7ca6160$875f2420$@fisglobal.com> To: Devin Teske X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-50.0 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: 'Devin Teske' , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, 'Andriy Gapon' Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:43:35 -0000 On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Devin Teske wrote: >=20 > I'm interested in which path you would choose amongst what I've seen = mentioned > thus far: >=20 > a. Modifying the boot menu to offer fine-grain control over each = aspect of Safe > Mode (wherein perhaps the Safe Mode option becomes a hook for a = sub-menu rather > than its current setup as an "On"/"Off" toggle). I would favor this. "Safe Mode" (or whatever it gets renamed to) = activates a sub menu with N number of knobs plus an all-on/all-off = option.=20 Scott