Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Dec 1995 22:04:17 -0500 (EST)
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Conclusion to nfsiod/lkm problem...
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.951222220227.15923A-100000@hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <199512230253.NAA04398@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Dec 1995, Bruce Evans wrote:

> >	After my last posting, where at the very bottom I questioned
> >my CFLAGS, I went into make.conf and removed the LDFLAGS=-static
> >line I had added in...
> 
> >	...it compiles now.  
> 
> >	So, the question remains...what is it about lkm that its functions
> >can't be statically linked?  I'm not 100% certain of what lkm does, from
> 
> Don't know, but LDFLAGS=-static means the same as LDFLAGS='-s tatic'.
> -s says to strip the object and the arg `tatic' is ignored.  Perhaps you
> meant -Bstatic.
>

	Ack...ya, that's what I meant...thanks...

Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail  Telnet Acct  DNS Hosting
scrappy@hub.org  |  WWW Services   Database Services  | Knowledge, 
 soon to be:     |                                    | Information and
scrappy@ki.net   |      WWW: http://hub.org           | Communications, Inc




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.951222220227.15923A-100000>