From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 22 19:04:43 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA02113 for current-outgoing; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 19:04:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [199.166.238.138]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA02106 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 19:04:37 -0800 (PST) Received: (from scrappy@localhost) by hub.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA15929; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 22:04:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 22:04:17 -0500 (EST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Bruce Evans cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Conclusion to nfsiod/lkm problem... In-Reply-To: <199512230253.NAA04398@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 23 Dec 1995, Bruce Evans wrote: > > After my last posting, where at the very bottom I questioned > >my CFLAGS, I went into make.conf and removed the LDFLAGS=-static > >line I had added in... > > > ...it compiles now. > > > So, the question remains...what is it about lkm that its functions > >can't be statically linked? I'm not 100% certain of what lkm does, from > > Don't know, but LDFLAGS=-static means the same as LDFLAGS='-s tatic'. > -s says to strip the object and the arg `tatic' is ignored. Perhaps you > meant -Bstatic. > Ack...ya, that's what I meant...thanks... Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting scrappy@hub.org | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge, soon to be: | | Information and scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://hub.org | Communications, Inc