Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:09:18 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Patching problem Message-ID: <76943F76D033D25B87CB5749@Paul-Schmehls-Computer.local> In-Reply-To: <D7B25AB7C48991A6558EB00E@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <D7B25AB7C48991A6558EB00E@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On January 23, 2006 4:08:54 PM -0600 Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> wrote: > I'm working on a slave port that applies some patches that are not needed > in the master port. > > Three of the files being patched are op_sguil.c, op_sguil.h and > op_plugbase.c. Those files exists in WRKDIR/src/output-plugins when the > tarball is extracted. How should I name these patches so that they will > be applied? > > I tried patch-src-output-plugins-op_*, but that fails. (I'm sure it's > because of the conflict in naming the output-plugins dir with a dash.) > > What's the workaround for this? > Just for the record, here's how I solved the problem. 1) Edited the patchfiles per Scott Hetzel's pointer (dumb mistake on my part) 2) Edited the Makefile to add PATCHDIR= files, so when the port builds it uses the patch files from its own FILESDIR but uses the RC script and pkg-message.in files from the master port's FILESDIR > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > University of Texas at Dallas > AVIEN Founding Member > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?76943F76D033D25B87CB5749>