From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 06:09:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BA616A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:09:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C46A43D1F for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:09:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id F30395309; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:09:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id F1C465308; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:09:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 7E82733CAA; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:09:02 +0200 (CEST) To: Andrey Chernov References: <20040328182314.GA99956@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330093548.GA46139@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330103119.GA47518@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330105948.GA48082@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330111059.GA48428@nagual.pp.ru> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:09:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040330111059.GA48428@nagual.pp.ru> (Andrey Chernov's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:10:59 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mtree -L is broken due to unneded type=link additions to BSD.*.dist X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:09:12 -0000 Andrey Chernov writes: > Alternatively, do you maybe mean that people directly calls mtree by > hand before port installing? It is not supported way to get right > directories in anycase and not worth to broke mtree -L, of course. So what *is* the supported way to create and populate ${PREFIX}? and why didn't you protest this change when it was discussed on the lists? the conclusion of that discussion was "BSD.*.dist doesn't list symlinks because we thought mtree couldn't handle them" DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no