From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 23 06:38:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E87216A404 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B36613C45E for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 83266 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2007 06:38:40 -0000 Received: from ppp-71-139-39-138.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO ?10.0.5.59?) (nate-mail@71.139.39.138) by root.org with ESMTPA; 23 Jan 2007 06:38:40 -0000 Message-ID: <45B5AD64.5060905@root.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:38:28 -0800 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <45AF925C.9050104@aei.mpg.de> <20070121205107.GF66756@uriah.heep.sax.de> <45B3E82D.2050207@root.org> <200701220936.15638.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200701220936.15638.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joerg Wunsch , freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI problems on HP Compaq nx6325 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:38:38 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday 21 January 2007 17:24, Nate Lawson wrote: >> Joerg Wunsch wrote: >>> As Nate Lawson wrote: >>> >>>>> Have a look at PR i386/104678, and the patches referenced there. >>>>> Using these patches, my nx6325 works reasonably well. ... >>>> I looked at this and the solution should be "don't use anything >>>> other than C1". >>> Nothing else is supported on the nx6325 anyway, only C1. So that's >>> certainly not the problem here. >> If nothing other than C1 is supported, I am almost certain the patch >> doesn't affect anything. So what problem were you seeing and how is it >> changed? > > These CPUs turn off the lapic timer in C1. > Apologies for my mistake. I see now that there's not an easy fix to this. Should we make it easier for such people to use some other timer but not mixed mode? What about the HPET given that these are very new systems and should have it? -- Nate