From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 8 02:18:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA20046 for current-outgoing; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 02:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA20041 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 02:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA02729; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 02:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199709080916.CAA02729@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" cc: Greg Lehey , Drew Derbyshire , Ollivier Robert , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lousy disk perf. under cpu load (was IDE vs SCSI) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 Sep 1997 23:23:52 PDT." <199709080623.XAA10617@MindBender.serv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 02:16:51 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >From The Desk Of "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" : > The standard qualifiers apply. This is one guys' experience, on a > single system, with a small number of drives. Your mileage and karma > may vary. > I have to say the same thing over here. IDE disk drives over here tend to go belly up and my scsi drives tend to work a lot longer. Of course, there will be others who will have the opposite experience and I am merely stating my personal experience both at home and at work. Amancio