Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:14:40 -0500 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith), questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc upgrade. Message-ID: <9603061614.AA28707@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199603061244.NAA08274@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> References: <199603052355.KAA20299@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> <199603061244.NAA08274@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 6 Mar 1996 13:44:15 +0100 (MET), Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> said: > Is there any reason why libc is built (by default) with -O rather > than -O2 ? Yes. -O2 is often buggy and even more often makes programs larger and slower. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9603061614.AA28707>