From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 12:41:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5FD16A4B3 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monster.schulte.org (monster.schulte.org [209.134.156.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECB743FBF for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:41:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from schulte+freebsd@nospam.schulte.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by monster.schulte.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0201FB2C; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:41:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from thor (thor.schulte.org [209.134.156.204]) by monster.schulte.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9413E1FB2B; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:41:46 -0500 (CDT) From: "Christopher Schulte" To: "'Vladislav Davidzon'" , Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:42:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <200309191849.h8JInEo8041874@plato.thinkhost.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcN+yTNC8AjB4iN+R96DIKiLCh8LCwAFYNzwAAGv1IA= Message-Id: <20030919194146.9413E1FB2B@monster.schulte.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre8 on monster.schulte.org Subject: RE: CVSUP For FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 19:41:50 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Vladislav Davidzon > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:51 PM > To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: CVSUP For FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p7 > > Greetings, > > I must be confused. I am doing a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_4_8 yet > cvsup seems to be fetching p5 instead of p7. Is there a problem that > I should be aware of here? Am I just being stupid? This same cvsup > file has never done this ever before -- always fetched the latest > patch level of the RELEASE without problem (that's how we're runing p5 > now!). Can someone explain? You might be fetching source from a stale cvsup server. Try one of the others till you get -p7. Then email the stale server's admin and let him/her know there's a problem. --Chris