From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 2 05:20:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210151065670 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 05:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAA48FC19 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 05:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (ltcfislmsgpa04 [127.0.0.1]) by ltcfislmsgpa04.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q024QLPg020265; Sun, 1 Jan 2012 22:59:05 -0600 Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa04.fnfis.com with ESMTP id 1231f18n0s-2 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:59:05 -0600 Received: from [10.0.0.103] (10.14.152.28) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sun, 1 Jan 2012 22:59:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: <20120102015015.GB2875@ma.sigsys.de> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 20:59:02 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20120102015015.GB2875@ma.sigsys.de> To: Raphael Eiselstein X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.28] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-02_02:2011-12-30, 2012-01-02, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/142972: JAILv2: a more complete mgmt solution? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:20:56 -0000 On Jan 1, 2012, at 5:50 PM, Raphael Eiselstein wrote: > Hello there, >=20 > I'm responding to conf/142972: [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in = rc.d/jailconf/142972 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D142972.=20 >=20 > bz wrote: >> As was said multiple times before, it is very unlikely that >> the current rc script will be changed for the experimental >> feature and a more complete mgmt solution is being sought of >> for the final support. >=20 > I understand, that /etc/rc.d/jail is currently far more than a "rc-script" > should be. But I like to use it with traditional jails, it works good > for me even with ifconfig and so on. >=20 > I'm about planning our[1] "next generation" jailhosting platform based on > FreeBSD 9 and with vimage support, maybe hierachical jails. Multiple-IP, > v4+v6, ... I don't know yet what and how...=20 >=20 > My idea is something like that: >=20 > * The host is booting several jails with epair-support.=20 > * I don't exactly how to configure epair in existing /etc/rc.d/* > * Each Jails will do it's own (local) IP setup on startup using local > /etc/rc.conf , so the host just needs to know about subnets... maybe. > * I'd like to have something which fits into /etc/rc.d/ and will be > configured through /etc/rc.conf >=20 > What is best practise here? Are there any standards or prototypes yet=20 > or do I have to invent my own wheel here? I hope not! >=20 > Hints and Howtos will be highly appreciated. I developed an rc.d script that you can download as a FreeBSD package and t= hen "pkg_add". http://druid.bsd.sourceforge.net/download/vimage-1.4.tbz http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/vimage.html --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.