From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 13:25:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB7537B401; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Daffy.timing.com (mx1.timing.com [206.168.13.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425C643FDF; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:25:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhein@timing.com) Received: from gromit.timing.com (gromit.timing.com [206.168.13.209]) by Daffy.timing.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h5HKP4H43317; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:25:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jhein@timing.com) Received: from gromit.timing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gromit.timing.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h5HKP3oI010456; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:25:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jhein@gromit.timing.com) Received: (from jhein@localhost) by gromit.timing.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.6/Submit) id h5HKP35V010453; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:25:03 -0600 (MDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16111.31007.226737.229721@gromit.timing.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:25:03 -0600 From: John E Hein To: Gerald Pfeifer In-Reply-To: <200306172012.h5HKCxal002059@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200306172012.h5HKCxal002059@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 21.1.1 cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/36167: _THREAD_SAFE & _REENTRANT used inconsistently X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:25:06 -0000 If the headers don't need them, is the documentation of the -pthread option in gcc(1) accurate (says -D_THREAD_SAFE should be supplied when compiling with -pthread)? I assume not. If not, then this bug becomes just a documentation bug for -current.