From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Nov 14 13:46: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from roaming.cacheboy.net (roaming.cacheboy.net [203.56.168.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFE437B479 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (from adrian@localhost) by roaming.cacheboy.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eAELjp504253 for arch@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:45:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from adrian) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:45:05 +0100 From: Adrian Chadd To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RANDOMDEV inspired realitycheck regarding i386/i486... Message-ID: <20001114224505.A4195@roaming.cacheboy.net> References: <11485.974210886@critter> <20001114144613.B88888@platinum.scientia.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20001114144613.B88888@platinum.scientia.demon.co.uk>; from ben@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 02:46:13PM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Nov 14, 2000, Ben Smithurst wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > If no /entropy is found it takes a full minute to do the randomdev > > seeding during boot on a P5/133. > > > > Has anybody run a 486 or 386 under current recently ? > 386'en might still have a place for small embedded products but I'm proabably going to be flamed when I say I think FreeBSD-current isn't very suited to "embedded 386 with tiny everything" applications. 2c, Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support for a lifetime." -- rec.humor.funny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message