Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:39:43 -0200
From:      Raphael Kubo da Costa <kubito@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Missing stdint.h includes?
Message-ID:  <87sjw1rfuo.fsf@gmail.com>
References:  <87vd0ys2no.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTimS-Ue_HmZ-rbU7k0WnmCFU9hns2KSo_ZiESkgQ@mail.gmail.com> <87fws2rqui.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTinb49f6jq73BoxTiMOZhmS=Tc%2BdwP8juuv2%2BOt4@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> writes:

> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <kubito@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As for devinfo.h, shouldn't it just include stdint.h, sys/types.h or
>> sys/param.h?
>
> sys/types.h should suffice, even though POSIX says it should be in
> inttypes.h: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/inttypes.h.html#tag_13_20
>
> Kind of odd why they're redefined there (in sys/types.h) to be honest,
> esp because POSIX doesn't say that they should be defined there.
> Probably some pollution introduced that would widely break compiles
> because sys/types.h is used everywhere, not inttypes.h.
>
>> What's the best way for me to help with this, PR-wise?
>
> I would honestly not go create more PR fodder. Just find a (doc?)
> developer with a commit bit who's interested in cleaning up
> incorrectness.

I've inlined two patches below:

 * The first one should correct the documentation for rman(9). I'm sure
   there are problems with other headers, but I haven't checked yet. It
   adds sys/types.h to the man page -- I'm not sure if inttypes.h would
   be better (DragonFly just adds sys/param.h, FWIW).

 * The second one makes devinfo.h include sys/types.h instead of
   sys/_types.h -- I still think devinfo.h users should not need to
   explicitly include whateverdefinesuint32_t.h, as this, IMHO, is an
   implementation detail. It also adds the include to devinfo_var.h,
   which, although not installed, should be self-contained. Feedback
   very welcome.

As a sidenote, what is the purpose of having both types.h and _types.h?

Thanks!

Patch 1:

Index: stable/8/share/man/man9/rman.9
===================================================================
--- stable/8/share/man/man9/rman.9	(revision 218362)
+++ stable/8/share/man/man9/rman.9	(working copy)
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
 .Nm rman_get_rid
 .Nd resource management functions
 .Sh SYNOPSIS
+.In sys/types.h
 .In sys/rman.h
 .Ft int
 .Fn rman_activate_resource "struct resource *r"

Patch 2:

Index: stable/8/lib/libdevinfo/devinfo.h
===================================================================
--- stable/8/lib/libdevinfo/devinfo.h	(revision 218362)
+++ stable/8/lib/libdevinfo/devinfo.h	(working copy)
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 #define _DEVINFO_H_INCLUDED
 
 #include <sys/cdefs.h>
-#include <sys/_types.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
 
 typedef __uintptr_t	devinfo_handle_t;
 #define DEVINFO_ROOT_DEVICE	((devinfo_handle_t)0)
Index: stable/8/lib/libdevinfo/devinfo_var.h
===================================================================
--- stable/8/lib/libdevinfo/devinfo_var.h	(revision 218362)
+++ stable/8/lib/libdevinfo/devinfo_var.h	(working copy)
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
  *	$FreeBSD$
  */
 
+#include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/rman.h>
 #include <sys/bus.h>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87sjw1rfuo.fsf>