From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jun 24 17:11: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AAB37B400 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [210.49.75.34] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5324aadf) with ESMTP id kjufaaaa for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:10:55 +1000 Message-ID: <3D17B4F1.7050203@quake.com.au> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:10:25 +1000 From: Kal Torak Organization: Quake Networking User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Bond Cc: FreeBSD ISP Subject: Re: Good dual port NICs? References: <200206242334.JAA10959@lightning.itga.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Gregory Bond wrote: > We had good luck with the Intel dual EtherExpress Pro 100 cards, even if they > do cost about 10x a single! This is still on FreeBSD 3.2 (soon, soon to be > 4.6). I was thinking about these cards since I currently have all EtherExpress Pro 100 cards.. But for the cost of the dual port Intel I can get a 4 port D-Link or something... How they justifiy the price when its basicaly two Pro 100's stuck onto one pcb I dont know.. The manufacturing costs cant be that much more... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message