From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jun 14 9:47:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D60937B403 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:47:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 784 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jun 2001 16:45:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:45:56 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Igor Roshchin Cc: nascar24@home.nl, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules Message-ID: <20010614194556.A729@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Igor Roshchin , nascar24@home.nl, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG References: <046b01c0f4e8$a32a9200$0900a8c0@windows> <200106141559.LAA90429@giganda.komkon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200106141559.LAA90429@giganda.komkon.org>; from str@giganda.komkon.org on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:59:28AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:59:28AM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote: > > > If those rules are all rules you have, > and I didn't miss any line, > no ftp would be allowed to go through, since > there is no rule for the port 21. > Aren't you mixing something ? ftp is at port 21. > Port 22 is ssh. > (Check /etc/services) > > However, I am puzzled, how do you manage to establish the initial connect > at all. This has been discussed before: his FTP server is listening on a high port. G'luck, Peter -- If this sentence were in Chinese, it would say something else. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message