From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Nov 18 23:37:58 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C293F155F9
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:37:54 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA14324;
	Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:37:53 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id AAA31331; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:38:27 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199911190738.AAA31331@harmony.village.org>
To: Alex Zepeda <jazepeda@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: PATCH for testing 
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:31:58 PST."
		<Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182331120.338-100000@localhost> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182331120.338-100000@localhost>  
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:38:26 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182331120.338-100000@localhost> Alex Zepeda writes:
: Then perhaps -a and -U should be disabled?  *grin*

No.  -e, -a, -U are all use for the sysadmin.  They can provide
sensitive information, so should have sensible access policies placed
upon their use.  While the current set of access policies may be less
than idea, it doesn't militate for their complete removal.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message