From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 12 21:33:26 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B056716A4CE; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:33:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw [140.112.90.75])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0D87F43D58; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:33:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
Received: from svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3CLWMrh041913;
	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:32:22 +0800 (CST)
	(envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
Received: (from rafan@localhost)
	by svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3CLVwHQ041900;
	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:31:58 +0800 (CST)
	(envelope-from rafan)
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:31:58 +0800
From: Rong-En Fan <rafan@infor.org>
To: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org>,
	Marcus Grando <marcus@corp.grupos.com.br>,
	Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>, sem@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050412213158.GA41666@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw>
References: <200503210441.j2L4fQRB021246@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw>
	<20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> <20050322090810.GY34807@k7.mavetju>
	<42401591.9090306@corp.grupos.com.br>
	<20050322133325.GA1849@heechee.tobez.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050322133325.GA1849@heechee.tobez.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
Subject: Re: mail/policyd name conflict
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:33:26 -0000

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:33:25PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:54:41AM -0300, Marcus Grando wrote:
> 
> > Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > >I would call them
> > >    mail/postfix-policyd
> > >    mail/postfix-policyd-spf
> > 
> > mail/postfix-policyd-spf
> > mail/postfix-policyd-greylist
> > 
> > I like this.
> > 
> > After ports freeze, i send PR to change this.
> > 
> > But don't forget to change executable name. I change to policyd-spf and 
> > the new port change to policyd-greylist or something.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> \Anton.

Hello All,

While I'm preparing a new shar for version 1.49, it comes to my
mind that the name conflict things.

As 1.49, it does more things (a helo auto blacking is added), I would
like to have 

mail/postfix-policyd-spf (the original mail/policyd)
mail/postfix-policyd

since greylisting is only part of it. As mentioned before, mail/sqlgrey
and mail/postgrey, will them changed to

mail/postfix-policyd-sqlgrey
mail/postfix-policyd-postgrey

A bit long name? If in this case, I would suggest that we don't
touch them and just rename mail/policyd to mail/policyd-spf
and the new one will be mail/policyd (just google policyd, it is
in the second result).

If there is no further problem, I would like to send this rename
pr and policyd 1.49 shar :-)

Regards,
Rong-En Fan