From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 13 13:42:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA12427 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 13 May 1997 13:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA12407 for ; Tue, 13 May 1997 13:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co (unalmodem18.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.48]) by apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA06866; Tue, 13 May 1997 15:43:56 -0500 (COT) Message-ID: <3378D1A3.321A@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 13:40:03 -0700 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Dawes CC: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNU is not tar References: <3377F32D.10DB@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> <19970513140357.63713@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> <33781510.52B9@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> <19970513152753.59938@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk David Dawes wrote: > > >The real problem, anyway, is that pax should be used instead of "tar" > >when building packages or preparing the distribution, to be more > >standard comformant. I think the ports tree uses pax anyway. > > I've seen problems with pax -- both the original version which I > tried some years ago, and the version that comes with Digital Unix > (and to which tar and cpio are linked). I've been avoiding it ever > since, and haven't tried the version included with FreeBSD. > > David FWIW, there is a commercial tar utility in http://www.cactus.com called "Lone-Tar". Too western for me :-).