From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  9 05:32:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 15B4E16A4CE; Tue,  9 Nov 2004 05:32:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ylpvm15.prodigy.net (ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.46])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C1B2943D45; Tue,  9 Nov 2004 05:32:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: from [10.0.5.50] (adsl-64-171-186-185.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
	[64.171.186.185])iA95WwqY031380;	Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:32:58 -0500
Message-ID: <419054C1.5050608@root.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:25:21 -0800
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040901)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: msch@snafu.de
References: <200409232235.08683.msch@snafu.de>
	<200409251822.11019.msch@snafu.de> <4155AE43.5010704@root.org>
	<200409252126.36670.msch@snafu.de>
In-Reply-To: <200409252126.36670.msch@snafu.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IRQ-Routing for 5.3-BETA
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 05:32:54 -0000

Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> On Saturday 25 September 2004 19:43, Nate Lawson wrote:
> 
>>Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
>>When the BIOS gives an initial irq, we always try to route to that
>>one first since some devices don't work at any other irq.
> 
> 
> I marked the appropriate IRQ in the BIOS as "ISA/nonPnP", so the marked 
> IRQ *should* be assigned for the ISA card by the BIOS (but obviously 
> isn't).
> 
> I hope I could clear the situation a bit.
> 
> I sure can switch to 6-CURRENT or at least try the new acpi_pci_link.c, 
> but I don't believe that the problem is IRQ 9....
> 
> Thank you very much for your interest. I fear, these old ISA cards are 
> no longer of public interest... :-)

I MFC'd the change to RELENG_5 as well so if you can test there or on 
6-current, you should fine that the card works as before.  The change 
was to allow the SCI (irq 9 on PIC systems) to always be used for 
devices, even if the ACPI _PRS setting for the device doesn't explicitly 
allow it.

-Nate