Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 13:28:28 +0200 (EET) From: Andrew Stesin <stesin@gu.net> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: Shawn Carey <smc@servtech.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone else seen this? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970326132352.6258H-100000@trifork.gu.net> In-Reply-To: <199703260321.NAA24228@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, Michael Smith wrote: > > This looks very much like a problem that has been reported many times > before, where one or more pages from a process' text are written back > to the file. The pages aren't actually changed, but the file's timestamp > is obviously updated. Just curious, what will happen in case the program file affected by this bug will occasionally reside on a R/O-mounted FS? If the kernel will eat this difference quietly, without any strange side effects, crashes, messages or so -- I'd probably wonder... Best regards, Andrew Stesin nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970326132352.6258H-100000>