Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 04:53:47 GMT From: soc-tyler <soc-tyler@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 79960 for review Message-ID: <200507110453.j6B4rlvO070322@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=79960 Change 79960 by soc-tyler@soc-tyler_launchd on 2005/07/11 04:53:03 To init.c or not to init.c, oi Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/soc2005/launchd/Makefile#3 edit .. //depot/projects/soc2005/launchd/NOTES#4 edit .. //depot/projects/soc2005/launchd/init.c#2 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/soc2005/launchd/Makefile#3 (text+ko) ==== @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ # $FreeBSD$ PROG= launchd -SRCS= launchd.c liblaunch.c launchdebugd.c launchproxy.c +SRCS= launchd.c liblaunch.c launchdebugd.c launchproxy.c init.c MAN= launchd.conf.5 launchd.plist.5 init.8 launchd.8 \ launchd_debug.8 launchproxy.8 rc.8 service.8 ==== //depot/projects/soc2005/launchd/NOTES#4 (text+ko) ==== @@ -18,3 +18,7 @@ fixed to accomodate. + o Regarding init(8) I'm still wondering whether or not it'd be best to take the stock + FreeBSD init(8) code, or the code that zarzycki@ and NeXT have modified for + Mac OS X (and NeXTStep). i.e. Fresh start or hackery begets hackery... + ==== //depot/projects/soc2005/launchd/init.c#2 (text+ko) ==== @@ -57,11 +57,13 @@ * SUCH DAMAGE. */ +/* Mac OS specifics #include <Security/Authorization.h> #include <Security/AuthorizationTags.h> #include <Security/AuthSession.h> #include <mach/port.h> +*/ #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/queue.h> @@ -90,7 +92,9 @@ #include <termios.h> #include "launchd.h" +/* mach/Mac OS specific #include "bootstrap_internal.h" +*/ #define _PATH_RUNCOM "/etc/rc"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507110453.j6B4rlvO070322>