From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 9 11:25:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68C6106566B for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBF78FC15 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.12] (helo=2.mx.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.70 #1) id 1NIKfk-0001mj-VU; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:25:32 +0100 Received: from p57ae1d0a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.174.29.10]:20289 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 2.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1NIKfk-0005XU-L6; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:25:32 +0100 Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:25:32 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Leonidas Tsampros Message-ID: <20091209122532.2c55aa22@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <86d42pjc1n.fsf@bifteki.lan> References: <86d42pjc1n.fsf@bifteki.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: old/unupdated xterm entries in termcap db X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:25:34 -0000 On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:12:04 +0200 Leonidas Tsampros wrote: > Why aren't these entries updated in order to match the > ones that ship with xterm? Am I missing something? > Probably because xterm is under ports and termcap under src and it would not be easy to track changes in ports under src. The only practical way to keep termcap up to date would be for the committer updating the port to also check and update termcap under src. The problem with this is that most ports committers aren't authorized to make commits under src. --- Gary Jennejohn